Before making the jump to Saigon, I told most anyone who would listen that one of my goals was to work with the public sector in its charge to administer the tourism industry. Shortly after I arrived, the opportunity to do just that landed in my lap. A colleague in the hotel industry offered me a seat on the Tourism Working Group (TWG) of the Vietnam Business Forum (VBF). The VBF was established by the International Finance Corporation, an arm of the World Bank. There are other working groups each representing a different sector (Capital Markets, Manufacturing, Infrastructure, etc.), and each group has its own ministerial counterparts; the TWG works with the Ministry of Culture, Sports & Tourism and the Vietnam National Administration of Tourism.
Side note -- Beyond learning Vietnamese, I had three goals to accomplish when I landed: 1) Sign on with a top-tier real estate development firm (check), 2) consult with the Vietnam National Administration of Tourism (check) and 3) open up a swank cocktail lounge a la Milk and Honey (still looking).
The VBF meets biannually and provides an opportunity for each working group to present their position on issues affecting their respective industries. One of the critical challenges Vietnam's tourism industry faces is the lack of infrastructure in terms of hotel accommodations, transportation and education, and the TWG used its time at the forum earlier this month to speak about the lack of hard and soft infrastructure.
The local news picked up on the infrastructure story -- see the above article which sources the TWG's position paper quite heavily. In fact, the article is a cut and paste operation, copying entire passages of our policy recommendations. I think the only original copy here is the verb tense change. We can look at this two ways. On one hand, it's great that we're generating ink for the issues and the press is telling the story we want and using our language to do so. On the other, this gives readers no assurance of editorial integrity. I'm of course thrilled to get published under someone else's byline but have to pull out that age-old cliche that 'you can't trust what you read.'












