In the United States alone, buildings account for:
- 65% of electricity consumption
- 36% of energy use
- 39% of greenhouse gas emissions
- 30% of raw materials use
- 30% of waste output and
- 12% of potable water consumption
The United States Green Building Council and its Leadership in Energy and Environmental Design certification program have been in the back of my head recently.
I got into a conversation with the guest of honor, and we were chatting about how the US Government reclaimed most all of its pre-1975 land holdings when it reestablished relations with Vietnam in the 90s. (A little birdy informs us that the French Embassy used to be property of the USA.) The consulate compound in Saigon was one of the properties, however, that it did get back. But of particular interest, he mentioned that he was clearing off his desk and passing off unfinished projects, one of which concerns a plot of land in HCMC to be developed for residential purposes.
The building will be a residential property with about 10% of the apts reserved for the consulate. The State Department intends to work with a private developer to build and finance the project and offer the remaining 90% of the units to the developer to sell as Grade-A condos. Ultimately, the handful of developer bids will go to congress for final selection.
I asked the officer about whether or not the new building would be required to meet a LEED Silver Rating per its energy consumption as required for all new federal buildings after the enactment of the Energy Policy Act of 2005. His comment was that security is usually the primary concern of federal buildings outside the motherland and that, to his knowledge, there were no LEED buildings maintained by the State Department outside the United States.
However, for this project, the primary use is not for the State Department, and therefore, security is not the ultimate concern. Considering that green buildings hit the trendy high road years ago, wouldn't a developer's proposal that touted a LEED certification appeal to the statesmen on Capitol Hill?
I saw news headlines in the making and passed this intel along to a prominent residential developer here in Vietnam, but the prospect fell on deaf ears. Ultimately, people are all about the Benjamins, and from a developers perspective, why would they want to spend more on construction and upfront consultancy fees, in the form of a LEED certified architect, when their exit strategy is to sell, therefore forgoing with any recouped costs achieved through reduced energy consumption. The tenants get the reduced bills, not the developers.
Ok. So what it boils down to in this scenario is the classic tale of economics: supply and demand. If consumers want it, the market will deliver it. And if more people watched Gore's Oscar winning powerpoint presentation, the demand for green buildings would surely outstrip supply.
But to present the facts and figures specific to Vietnam's nascent green building demand, please allow me to point you to CBRE's "Vietnam is Ripe for Green" presentation delivered by Marc Townsend, known for his rapturous speeches, and a "2008 Green Buildings Market Report", delivered by Thor Kerr of BCI Asia at the Futurac Conference in March.
Oh, and there already is a LEED Certified building outside the US, and it belongs to the State Department. Congratulations Bulgaria.






















